I have an idea that another way of preventing being tracked is just massively spamming trash in the data layer object, pushing thousands of dollars worth of purchase events and such, pushing randomly generated user details and other such events. Perhaps by doing this your real data will be hard to filter out. A side effect is also that data becomes unreliable overall, helping less privacy aware people in the process.
By BurnerBotje a day ago
Now there’s a fun idea!! I wonder how difficult it would be to spoof events.
Since installing it on firefox on this computer (18 months ago or so) Ad Nauseam has clicked ~$38,000 worth of ads, that i never saw.
Between this and "track me not" i've been fighting back against ads and connecting my "profile" with any habits since 2016 or so. I should also note i have pihole and my own DNS server upstream, so that's thiry-eight grand in ad clicks that got through blacklists.
[Preface: I hate ads, I love uBlock origin, I use pihole, I'm a proponent of ad blockers]
I manage a Google Ads account with a $500,000 budget. That budget is spent on a mix of display ads, google search, and youtube ads.
If I knew that 10% of our budget was wasted on bot clicks, there's nothing I can do as an advertiser. We can't stop advertising... we want to grow our business and advertising is how you get your name out there. We also can't stop using Google Ads - where else would we go?
$38,000 in clicks boosts Google's revenue by $38k (Google ain't complaining). The only entity you're hurting are the advertisers using Google. Advertisers might see their campaigns performing less well, but that's not going to stop them from advertising. If anything, they'll increase budgets to counteract the fake bot clicks.
I really don't understand what Ad Nauseam is trying to achieve. It honestly seems like it benefits Google more than it hurts them. It directly hurts advertisers, but not enough that it would stop anyone from advertising.
Google has a system for refunding advertisers for invalid clicks. The $500k account that I manage gets refunded about $50/month in invalid clicks. I'm guessing if bot clicks started making a real dent in advertiser performance, Google would counter that by improving their bot detection so they can refund advertisers in higher volumes. If there's ever an advertiser-led boycott of Google Ads, Google would almost certainly respond by refunding advertisers for bot clicks at much higher rates.
By cj a day ago
> I really don't understand what Ad Nauseam is trying to achieve. It honestly seems like it benefits Google more than it hurts them.
Google is part of the problem, but they're neither the only ones nor best to target through bottom-up approaches.
> It directly hurts advertisers, but not enough that it would stop anyone from advertising.
You know the saying about XML - if it doesn't solve the problem, you are not using enough of it.
> there's nothing I can do as an advertiser. We can't stop advertising...
We know. The whole thing is a cancer[0], a runaway negative feedback loop. No single enlightened advertiser can do anything about it unilaterally. Which is why the pressure needs to go up until ~everyone wants change.
> Which is why the pressure needs to go up until ~everyone wants change.
I think the point made is that this adds no extra pressure.
By donohoe 15 hours ago
You know, I'm not too worried that I'm making the lives of people who spy on me harder and wasting their money.
You don't have to buy privacy violating ads. You don't have to buy targetted ads
By malfist a day ago
> You don't have to buy privacy violating ads. You don't have to buy targetted ads.
Sadly, you do until the monopoly is broken up. Because as is your company probably won't survive in the market, nor you in your role, using anything else.
By paulryanrogers 13 hours ago
I think the idea is that hurting entities who are pushing out a lot of ads is a good thing.
By BrenBarn 20 hours ago
Ads hurt people by stealing attention and manipulating spending intentions. Being exposed to a firehose of them makes us more stupid and poorer.
By heisenbit 20 hours ago
Hopefully it puts my browsers on an bot blocklist, which then invalidates the tracking profile and eliminates targeted advertising entirely.
By freeone3000 a day ago
The problem with being on google's bot blocklist is you'll suddenly discover that recaptcha is used in a heck of a lot of places.
By michaelt a day ago
My assumption with something as hostile as ad nauseum is that you were running the risk of Google profile bans
By thatguy0900 a day ago
> It honestly seems like it benefits Google more than it hurts them. It directly hurts advertisers, but not enough that it would stop anyone from advertising.
GP fights agains ads, not Google. And not being able to win 100% of the gain shouldn’t restrain someone from taking action it they consider the win share worth the pain.
> $38,000 in clicks boosts Google's revenue by $38k
You should include costs here, and if (big if) a substantial part of the clicks comes from bots and get refunded, the associated cost comes on top of the bill. At the end the whole business is impacted. I agree 50/50k is a penny through.
> I hate ads […] I manage a Google Ads account
[no cynism here, I genuinely wonder] how do you manage your conscience, mood and daily motivation? Do you see a dichotomy in what you wrote and if so, how did you arrive to that situation? Any future plan?
I’m asking as you kind of introduce the subject but if you’re not willing to give more details that’s totally fine.
By aziaziazi a day ago
> I hate ads
> The only entity you're hurting are the advertisers using Google.
That’s fine. Advertising is cancer. Reducing advertisers’ ROI is good too.
You don’t hate ads if you’re spending $500k on them. You just hate receiving ads, which makes you hypocritical.
By sneak a day ago
Well, in today's reality you need a job to at least pay rent. And employers need advertising to make money to pay their workers.
It's factually impossible to live in modern society without participating in ethically questionable activities at least indirectly.
By mschuster91 11 hours ago
> I'm guessing if bot clicks started making a real dent in advertiser performance, Google would counter that by improving their bot detection so they can refund advertisers in higher volumes.
They already have methods to detect a lot. Like you said yourself, customers have no alternative, so why would they refund money they don't have to?
By ddtaylor a day ago
I’d hope you’ll find an advocacy group to join who’ll sue google for billions in fraud and lost revenue.
By wodenokoto 13 hours ago
The point is to poison your ad tracking profile so that advertisers can't figure out who you are and what you'll buy.
No matter how secure your browser setup is, Google is tracking you. By filling their trackers with garbage, there's less that can personally identify you as an individual
By mystified5016 a day ago
Apple bought the patent to do just that 13 years ago … the .Mac observer article about it is now gone - here is the archive record
Carter invented it and got paid so they can bury it. Must be good tech.
By mediumsmart a day ago
> want to grow our business and advertising is how you get your name out there
Or.. you know.. offering a quality product?
By jorvi a day ago
Tiny trafic but everyone is buying things. High praise in the reviews, not a single organic link.
By econ a day ago
By hurting the advertisers you hurt google. It sucks that you are disadvantaged by it, but the truth of the matter is that once it becomes expensive enough it will not be worth it economically. And it is clear from your own message this is the only language you're willing to speak.
By krageon 14 hours ago
And you also hurt the people who create the content that you consume, it is a very toxic attitude (and maybe even illegal as it causes intentional financial damage)
By rvnx 12 hours ago
Oh well. Advertisers are the scum of the earth, the only thing worse is those facilitating them. Driving a wedge between advertisers and googles is a win.
By snickerdoodle12 13 hours ago
This is great. I seek out competitors to the companies that advertise so I can get the product without rewarding advertisers.
Man scape? Nah, generic women's razers. Pcbway? Nope. JLCPCB.
Screw your ads. Find a better way.
By behringer a day ago
JLCPCB does tons of sponsored segments on YT. I see them more than Pcbway.
By pests 8 hours ago
JLC advertise constantly, just look at the eevblog forums.
By 1n4007 12 hours ago
> JLCPCB
How are they?
By dotancohen 15 hours ago
[flagged]
By remram a day ago
Probably just doesn't want to take his work home with him :P
In a way I get it, I wouldn't buy or recommend the product I currently work on. Still cash the paychecks though. I also am the stereotypical tech person who avoids technology. I can't exactly blame anyone for playing the game. The guy who works at the sausage factory but won't eat sausage due to what he's seen is a pretty common refrain.
By Spivak a day ago
[deleted]
By a day ago
I would worry about being labeled a bot and denied access to websites at all.
By Wowfunhappy a day ago
What do you expect this to do, long term? I’m curious.
By wglb 13 hours ago
Even if it merely makes using Google shenanigans unattractive for advertisers, that would be a huge win against one of the biggest perpetrators, privacy and data protection violators out there.
By zelphirkalt 11 hours ago
How unattractive do you think it will make it for them?
Chrome banned it from their add on store but it can still be installed manually
By culi a day ago
AdNaueam works against ads, but does it also work against Google Tag Manager?
I've already got most ads blocked by simply Piholing them, but GTM tracking my every move using first-party content is a different kind of interaction to attack.
By jeroenhd 10 hours ago
just block GTM
By redeeman 4 hours ago
Would be nice to have something similar to this for Mixpanel and Amplitude
By mmsc 15 hours ago
I’d imagine that by this point in time, they are able to filter this specific type of noise out of the dataset. They have been tracking everyone for so long that I doubt there’s anyone they don’t know about whether directly of shadow profiles. These randomly generated users would just not match up to anything and would be fine to just drop
By dylan604 a day ago
I have a quite common name in my country and snatched firstname.lastname@gmail.com for that name many years ago. Many use it by accident somehow when registering for things. Possibly (hopefully!) half of all leaks containing my email address are for other people. Never thought of what it might do for ad profiling, but hopefully it is adding at least some noise to it.
Maybe I could manually improve a bit on that by deliberately register myself for various random services and just clicking around a bit to pretend I am interested in things I have no interest in. On the other hand with 20 years of tracking I think Google has all my interests and habits nailed down anyway.
By 3036e4 17 hours ago
Am I dumb or does this article fail to explain what does the tag manager actually do? And not just with a loaded word, such as surveillance or spying, but actually technically explain what they are selling for and why it is bad.
By aerzen a day ago
Google Tag Manager is a single place for you to drop in and manage all the tracking snippets you might want to add to your site. When I've worked on B2C sites that run a lot of paid advertising campaigns, the marketing team would frequently ask me to add this tracking pixel or another, usually when we were testing a new ad channel. Want to start running ads on Snapchat? Gotta ad the Snapchat tracker to your site to know when users convert. Now doing TikTok? That's another snippet. Sometimes there would be additional business logic for which pages to fire or not fire, and this would change more often. Sometimes it was so they could use a different analytics tool.
While these were almost always very easy tickets to do, they were just one more interruption for us and a blocker for the stakeholders, who liked to have an extremely rapid iteration cycle themselves.
GTM was a way to make this self-service, instead of the eng team having to keep this updated, and also it was clear to everyone what all the different trackers were.
By mlinsey a day ago
The self-service thing is such a nightmare. There are two things that you almost certainly cannot trust your marketing team with:
1. Understanding the security implications of code they add via tag manager. How good are they at auditing the third parties that they introduce to make sure they have rock-solid security? Even worse, do they understand that they need to be very careful not to add JavaScript code that someone emailed to them with a message that says "Important! The CEO says add this code right now!".
2. Understand the performance overhead of new code. Did they just drop in a tag that loads a full 1MB of JavaScript code before the page becomes responsive? Can they figure that out themselves? Are they positioned to make good decisions on trade-offs with respect to analytics compared to site performance?
By simonw a day ago
I agree with this and can add two more problems that are super common.
Firstly, people will add all sorts of things on a whim without telling anybody. So your privacy policy won’t capture any of this.
Secondly, nobody ever cleans up after themselves. So a year down the line, you’ll have a dozen different services, all doing the same thing, all added by different people, and half of them aren’t even being used by anybody because the people that added them forgot about them or left the company.
I don’t think I’ve ever seen GTM used responsibly.
By JimDabell 20 hours ago
If there is one thing you can trust marketing departments with, it's their ability to ruin any website they have the chance of ruining.
By zelphirkalt 12 hours ago
Yep it's vibe coding before vibe coding existed. Paste in the script. No code review. No staging. No roll-out. Just straight in prod. And it can break stuff.
By bravesoul2 21 hours ago
You effectively delegate code-review on a XSS path to your marketing team. I refused to do that anywhere users could be logged in.
By captn3m0 21 hours ago
Agreed that it's a nightmare, but what usually happens then is that an MBA-type VP will come in and demand the marketing team be allowed to insert whatever they want. Not many dev teams have the political clout to push back.
By gnz11 6 hours ago
I was tasked with auditing third party scripts at a client a couple of years ago, the marketing people where unable to explain wtf tag manager does concretely without resorting to ‚it tracks campaign engagement´ mumbo jumbo, but were adamant they they can’t live without it.
By a2800276 a day ago
This may have changed, I last used Tag Manager 9-10 ago. You basically added a single Javascript snippet to you website, then you could inject other Javascript into the pages, using various rules. So rather than having to redeploy our site every time the marketing department wanted to add a new tracking or retargeting script, we could just add it in Tag Manager. I think is a great tool if you insist on doing these types of thing. You can also extract and transform variables, so all the customization required to adapt to each service could be done within Tag Manager, keeping your website simpler.
One major issue Tag Manager solved for us was that a bunch of these online marketing companies that have their own tracking pixels/scripts absolutely suck at running IT infrastructure. More than ones we experienced poorly written 3rd. party scripts would break our site. Rather than having to do a redeployment, to temporarily disable a script, I could easily pop into the Tag Manager console and disable to offending service.
Maybe Google Tag Manager has changed, but it was a good tool, if you where in the business of doing those sorts of things. I suppose it's also a clever way of blocking all tracking from a site by just stopping the Tag Manager script from loading.
By mrweasel 9 hours ago
XSS-as-a-service. It lets people drop in random JavaScript to be injected on to the page without any oversight.
It’s used by marketing people to add the 1001 trackers they love to use.
By sitharus a day ago
The chief reason is that websites pay for advertising and want to know if the advertising is working and Google tag manager is the way to do that, for Google Ads.
This is not unreasonable! People spend a lot of money on ads and would like to find out if and when they work. But people act like its an unspeakable nebulous crime but this is probably the most common case by miles.
By simonsarris a day ago
If running spyware on people's browsers just to see if your ads are working is "not unreasonable", what is?
By throwaway65449 a day ago
Try responding in good faith on a non-throwaway account.
By arcfour a day ago
Why should an advertiser have a right to know if their ads work, regardless of privacy considerations. EU brought out a freaking legal framework around this. I can't take seriously how you've over simplified it.
By bravesoul2 21 hours ago
Tracking website ads has become so normalised, it doesn't seem to even cross the minds of web-only marketing people to think: how has this always worked for advertising via TV, radio, billboards, newspapers/magazines, etc?
Website-based advertising is a special case - the only one that makes this tracking possible. Advertisers need to understand the huge advantage they've been given, rather than taking it as a given and thinking they have more of a right to the data, than the user has a right to not provide it.
By abanana 14 hours ago
This is not unreasonable! People spend a lot of money on ads and would like to find out if and when they work.
Companies were doing this for hundreds of years before Google even existed. You can learn if your ads work without invasive tracking.
By reaperducer a day ago
It feels that way for a lot of privacy concerns. "Telemetry" is the scare word for debug log, core dumps, and stack traces. I think it’s completely reasonable to want those.
By jppittma 11 hours ago
It's reasonable to want and ask for debug data. Not so reasonable to exfiltrate it without the owner's permission.
By ndriscoll 7 hours ago
It’s a little bit like dependency injection for websites, used by marketing teams.
The people responsible for maintaining a site don’t want to know about all the different analytics tools the marketing team wants to use, and don’t want to be involved whenever any changes need to be made. So they expose a mechanism where the marketing team can inject functionality onto the page. Then all the marketing tools tell the marketing team how to use GTM to inject their tool.
By JimDabell 20 hours ago
Google Tag Manager lets you add tracking stuff on your website without needing to touch the code every time. So if you want to track things like link clicks, PDF downloads, or people adding stuff to their cart.
It doesn't track things by itself. It just links your data to other tools like Google Analytics or Facebook Pixel to do the tracking.
This kind of data lets businesses do stuff like send coupon emails to people who left something in their cart.
There are lots of other uses. Basically, any time you want to add code or track behavior without dealing with a developer.
By sandspar a day ago
Maybe you’re being misled by the cryptic name. It’s got nothing to do with managing tags, it’s a behaviour tracker and fingerprint machine.
By fguerraz a day ago
I mean technically you can use it to manage HTML tags to inject into a site.
By 9dev a day ago
This is in fact what it is primarily used for.
By snowwrestler a day ago
Well I can inject HTML tags (or elements) with native JavaScript. Or manage them. Why would I want a bloated third party piece of software doing that?
By slow_typist a day ago
Since you're asking, you could use it to tie together triggers and actions to embed code in specific situations (eg. based on the URL or page state). It has automatic versioning. There's a preview feature for testing code changes before deploying, and a permission system for sharing view/edit access with others.
By SquareWheel a day ago
So that your sales and marketing team can add the third-party tracker for a new ad campaign service without bothering the engineering team.
By connicpu a day ago
They can also add features! Yes have fun!
By bravesoul2 21 hours ago
[deleted]
By a day ago
There's a section in the article titled, "WHAT DOES GOOGLE TAG MANAGER DO?":
> Whilst Google would love the general public to believe that Tag Manager covers a wide range of general purpose duties, it's almost exclusively used for one thing: surveillance.
By xiande04 a day ago
That’s a single word, not much of an actual explanation.
By munchler a day ago
the "general public" probably has no idea that Tag Manager is a thing that exists.
By Finnucane a day ago
Years ago, I worked on a site where we constantly had requests from the non technical side of the company to make the site load faster. We were perplexed in engineering. The site loaded and was ready for us in less than a fraction of a second.
Eventually we realized that every dev ran ubo, and tried loading the site without it. It took about 5 seconds. Marketing and other parts of the company had loaded so much crap into GTM that it just bogged everything down
By paradox460 a day ago
This is why I generally keep a mostly-clean browser around for development (only including some dev extensions). I've wasted half an hour when I had a stray uBO filter go off on a component I was working on once (wasn't even an ad) and that taught me a valuable lesson.
If you're testing a website, you've got to test it like your customers use it. I shake my head at the incompetence of web designers every time I encounter a website filled with scroll bars because the devs on macOS haven't bothered testing any other device.
By jeroenhd 10 hours ago
I'm all for blocking surveillance but how tiring is it to block JavaScript as suggested and then watch the majority of the internet not work?
By gleenn a day ago
It really isn't. I've been blocking all JavaScript for years now, selectively allowing what is essential for sites to run or using a private session to allow more/investigate/discover. Most sites work fine without their 30 JS sources, just allowing what is hosted on their own domain. It takes a little effort, but it's a fair price to pay to have a sane Internet.
The thing is - with everything - it's never easy to have strong principles. If it were, everyone would do it.
By pluc a day ago
It's certainly not that bad if you have uMatrix to do it with, but I haven't found a reasonable way to do it on mobile. uMatrix does work on Firefox Mobile but the UI is only semi functional.
By roywiggins a day ago
uMatrix is fully-functional on Nightly.
Using Firefox Add-Ons on a "smartphone" sucks because one has to access every Add-On interface via an Extensions menu.
In that sense _all_ Add-Ons are only semi-functional.
I use multiple layers: uMatrix + NetGuard + Nebulo "DNS Rules", at the least. Thus I have at least three opportunities where I can block lookups for and requests to Google domains.
By 1vuio0pswjnm7 a day ago
Doesn’t uBlock Origin in advanced mode do the exact same thing as uMatrix?
Having tried both, IMHO they do not do exactly the same thing. One is pattern-based, the other is host-based. As such, one can use them together, simultaneously.
By 1vuio0pswjnm7 a day ago
Maybe, but the UX is so terrible that I never figured out how to use uBO to replace uMatrix. I always use both: uBO for ads and DOM elements filtering and uMatrix for JavaScript, frames, cookies, anything in the columns of its UI.
Basically uMatrix is so donor to use that anybody can use it. The equivalent uBO section is so complicated that I feel I need to take a master degree in that subject.
By pmontra a day ago
Not quite the same (I love uMatrix UI), but advanced mode in uBO is similar. It lacks filtering by data type (css, js, images, fonts,...) per domain, but it does resolve domains to their primary domain, revealing where they are hosted. A huge kudos to gorhill for both of these!
By bornfreddy a day ago
NoScript + uBO is all right.
By baobun a day ago
Yup that's what I use as well. With whatever the name of the extension that makes allowing cookies a whitelist thing too, and PrivacyBadger/Decentraleyes.
Also, deleting everything when Firefox closes. It's a little annoying to re-login to everything every day, but again, they are banking on this inconvenience to fuck you over and I refuse to let them win. It becomes part of the routine easily enough.
By pluc a day ago
That’s my default as well. Self hosted/1st party scripts can load, but 3rd party scripts are blocked. The vast majority of sites work this way. If a site doesn’t work because they must have a 3rd party script to work, I tend to just close the tab. I really don’t feel like it has caused me to miss anything. There’s usually 8 other sites with the same data in a slightly less hostile site
By dylan604 a day ago
Do you selectively enable JavaScript for the whole site, or is there a way with uBO to only enable subparts of it?
It has pretty advanced features but also basic ones that allow you to block scripts by source
By culi a day ago
Impossible to know because when I disable Javascript "the majority of the internet" works fine. As does a majority of the web.
I read HN and every site submitted to HN using TCP clients and a text-only browser, that has no Javascript engine, to convert HTML to text.
The keyword is "read". Javascript is not necessary for requesting or reading documents. Web developers may use it but that doesn't mean it is necessary for sending HTTP requests or reading HTML or JSON.
If the web user is trying to do something else other than requesting and reading, then perhaps it might not "work".
By 1vuio0pswjnm7 a day ago
[dead]
By zelphirkalt 7 hours ago
It depends.
If you're spending 99% of your time on your favourite websites that you've already tuned the blocking on? Barely a problem.
On the other hand if your job involves going to lots of different vendors' websites - you'll find it pretty burdensome, because you might end up fiddling with the per-site settings 15+ times per day.
By michaelt a day ago
If I’m at work using a work provided computer, I don’t bother with the blocking. They are not tracking me as I do not do anything as me. I’m just some corporate stooge employee that has no similarity to me personally.
My personal devices block everything I can get away with
By dylan604 a day ago
Whitelisting JS has worked on my end for a while.
I won't browse the Internet on my phone without it, everything loads instantly and any site that actually matters was whitelisted years ago.
By heavyset_go a day ago
It's easier than I thought. I just use uBlock Origin with everything blocked by default and then allow selectively.
By sureglymop a day ago
Echoing others, I've used NoScript for years and at this point it is practically unnoticeable.
Many sites work without (some, like random news & blogs, work better). When a site doesn't work, I make a choice between temporarily or permanently allowing it depending on how often I visit the site. It takes maybe 5 seconds and I typically only need to spend that 5 seconds once. As a reward, I enjoy a much better web experience.
By qualeed a day ago
StackOverflow switched over from spying with ajax.google.com to GTM in the past year or so. All for some pointless out of date jQuery code they could self-host. I wonder how much they're being paid to let Google collect user stats from their site.
By kevin_thibedeau a day ago
People who want you to run their scripts aren't really your friends
By goopypoop a day ago
The sites that don't work are usually the worst websites around - you end up not missing much. And if it's a store or whatever, you can unblock all js when you actually want to buy.
By anothernewdude a day ago
About as tiring as hearing about it all the time. Thank god it's a fringe topic these days but this article snuck it in. Probably the constant use of the word "surveillance" was an early tell haha.
By Rapzid a day ago
>Use uBlock Origin with JavaScript disabled, as described above, but also with ALL third-party content hard-blocked. To achieve the latter, you need to add the rule ||.^$third-party to the My Filters pane.
This is a worse way to implement uBO's "Hard Mode" (except with JS blocked), which has the advantage that you can easily whitelist sites individually and set a hotkey to switch to lesser blocking modes.
I don't think this article makes a good case for why you should.
>The more of us who incapacitate Google's analytics products and their support mechanism, the better. Not just for the good of each individual person implementing the blocks - but in a wider sense, because if enough people block Google Analytics 4, it will go the same way as Universal Google Analytics. These products rely on gaining access to the majority of Web users. If too many people block them, they become useless and have to be withdrawn.
OK - but then also in the wider sense, if site owners can't easily assess the performance of their site relative to user behavior to make improvements, now the overall UX of the web declines. Should we go back to static pages and mining Urchin extracts, and guessing what people care about?
By adamiscool8 a day ago
But I like it better when they have to guess. If it's something we care about enough, we'll let them know.
By card_zero a day ago
> if site owners can't easily assess the performance of their site
I would be more than happy to opt in to performance metrics or other reports if only I could have some level of trust that improving the UX is all it's gonna be used for. I want to live in a world where that is the everyday normal, and where the non-consensual collection and sale of personal data is a high-profile public scandal with severe legal consequences.
By Timwi 7 hours ago
> Should we go back to static pages and mining Urchin extracts, and guessing what people care about?
Yes absolutely do this please.
Why even bother with the effort of analytics only to ignore the answers? I'm honestly not sure I've ever seen a website improve.
By goopypoop 2 hours ago
Belt and suspenders approach is to attach analytics to the most important events on the server side and combine with the session.
If the frontend automatic js is blocked, it doesn’t matter.
By bredren a day ago
Effective and accessible UX design is a solved problem. It’s a matter of education of front end developers, not of A/B testing your users to death.
By slow_typist a day ago
If the analytics brought us to this, of what use are the analytics?
By add-sub-mul-div a day ago
Analytics can have good uses, but these days it's mostly used to improve things for the operator (more sales, conversions, etc) and what's best for the website isn't always the best for the user. And so I block all that.
By throw123xz a day ago
> Meanwhile, Google Tag Manager is regularly popping up on Government sites. This means not only that governments can study you in more depth - but also that Google gets to follow you into much more private spaces.
The corruption of the system knows no bounds.
By tempodox a day ago
> surveillanceware
I thought the term was spyware.
Surveillanceware almost sounds like something necessary to prevent bad stuff. Is this corporate rebranding to make spyware software sound less bad?
By fvgvkujdfbllo a day ago
I don't know, the memetics of Surveillanceware or spyware mostly leads me to the belief that everything is weaponized to drain your money thru ads/marketing instead of the direct approach of stealing my money.
Perhaps some filter in your list already utilizing this but I'm unable to verify
By user070223 18 hours ago
I use:
VPN so constantly changing ip.
Tor browser for everyday browsing (has no script preinstalled). So onion provides double Vpn. Regularly closed down so history cleared.
Safari in private mode and lockdown mode for when tor won't work (tor ip blocked/hd video that is too slow to stream on tor). Safari Isolation in private mode is excellent, you can use two tabs with, say emails, and neither will know other is logged in.
Safari non private for sites I want available and in sync across devices.
Firefox in permanent private mode with ublock origin for when safari lockdown mode causes issues. (Bizarely Firefox containers doesn't work in private so no isolation across tabs).
Chromium for logged into Google stuff.
Chrome for web development.
Plus opt out for everything possible inc targeted ads.
I rarely see ads of anything I would want to buy, and VPN blocks most of it at its DNS.
Beyond that, anything else would be too much effort for me.
The advertising companies I'm sure know I am not susceptible to impulse buy on ads, I research and seek vfm so not really their target.
By v5v3 a day ago
> Tor browser for everyday browsing
Do you just... log back in to Hacker News every day?
I downloaded the Mullvad browser (basically Tor without the onion protocol part) but having no way to save passwords ended up making it unusable for me
By culi a day ago
What platform do you use that doesn't allow for password managers? A browser's password manager is not the ideal for security, apparently (I would like to know how generally true this is, of course saving them on Google or Microsoft is as good as idea as it sounds)
By sheiyei 21 hours ago
As said, use a password manager.
Also regularly export your passwords from your password manager, either to another password manager or encrypt and store.So if the password manager has issues it won't leave you stuck.
By v5v3 19 hours ago
How refreshing, a website that doesn’t punch me in the face with a cookie banner. Is that because they’re legit not tracking me or are they just noncompliant?
By padjo 19 hours ago
Blocking Google Tag Manager script injection seems to have few side effects.
Blocking third party cookies also seems to have few side effects.
Turning off Javascript breaks too much.
You can then enable just enough JS to make sites work, slowly building a list of just what is necessary. It can also block fonts, webgl, prefetch, ping and all those other supercookie-enabling techniques.
The same with traditional cookies. I use Cookie AutoDelete to remove _all_ cookies as soon as I close the tab. I can then whitelist the ones I notice impact on authentication.
Also, you should disable JavaScript JIT, so the scripts that eventually load are less effective at exploiting potential vulnerabilities that could expose your data.
By alganet a day ago
Why would JIT be more likely to have such a vulnerability than a JavaScript engine without JIT?
Is there a good way to collect basic analytics if you have a site you're hosting on GitHub pages? In such cases I'd rather not rely on Google Analytics if I don't have to.
I figured... just wanted to see which ones people on HN think are worth looking at.
By ayaros a day ago
Just add the domain to your /etc/hosts as 0.0.0.0
Doing that for years
By rurban a day ago
As mentioned on the blog post:
> Used as supplied, Google Tag Manager can be blocked by third-party content-blocker extensions. uBlock Origin blocks GTM by default, and some browsers with native content-blocking based on uBO - such as Brave - will block it too.
> Some preds, however, full-on will not take no for an answer, and they use a workaround to circumvent these blocking mechanisms. What they do is transfer Google Tag Manager and its connected analytics to the server side of the Web connection. This trick turns a third-party resource into a first-party resource. Tag Manager itself becomes unblockable. But running GTM on the server does not lay the site admin a golden egg...
By serving the Google Analytics JS from the site's own domain, this makes it harder to block using only DNS. (e.g. Pi-Hole, hosts file, etc.)
One might think "yeah but the google js still has to talk to google domains", but apparently, Google lets you do "server-side" tagging now (e.g. running a google tag manager docker container). This means more (sub)domains to track and block. That said, how many site operators choose to go this far, I don't know.
Slightly related I've also been recently noticing some sites loading ads pseudo-dynamically from "content-loader" subdomains usually used to serve images. It's obnoxious because blocking that subdomain at the DNS level usually breaks the site.
My current strategy is to fully block the domain if that's the sort of tactic they're willing to use.
I am going to use this for sure, but it is a little ironic.
By iknownothow a day ago
What if we could resolve every domain to 0.0.0.0 by default at the start. When visiting a website manually through the browser's URL bar it would automatically be whitelisted. Clicking links would also whitelist the domain of the link only. Sure you'd have to occasionally allow some 3rd party domains as well. Guess it would be cumbersome at first but after a while it would be pretty stable and wouldn't require much extra attention.
Try pihole (self-hosted) or nextdns if you want something that stays up to date.
By lazyeye a day ago
Google Tag Manager and the whole consent management platform certification business is nothing more than a shakedown. It's racketeering.
By drcongo a day ago
ugh... if you think the internet should be a "static webpage" i got bad news for you bud
By lerp-io a day ago
The term is a little ambiguous. They're not referring to a website that is served from static files that never change (which would exclude forums like Hacker News). They're referring to websites that still work if you disable JavaScript, so Hacker News would still be included.
By Timwi 7 hours ago
That's hilarious. Do you really Google should be privacy respecting?
By aleppopepper a day ago
We had a disgusting number of tags on some of our customer pages and a few dozen of them start to have effects on page load, especially if you were still on HTTP 1.1.
By BurnerBotje a day ago
By chamomeal a day ago
By genewitch a day ago
By cj a day ago
By TeMPOraL a day ago
By donohoe 15 hours ago
By malfist a day ago
By paulryanrogers 13 hours ago
By BrenBarn 20 hours ago
By heisenbit 20 hours ago
By freeone3000 a day ago
By michaelt a day ago
By thatguy0900 a day ago
By aziaziazi a day ago
By sneak a day ago
By mschuster91 11 hours ago
By ddtaylor a day ago
By wodenokoto 13 hours ago
By mystified5016 a day ago
By mediumsmart a day ago
By jorvi a day ago
By econ a day ago
By krageon 14 hours ago
By rvnx 12 hours ago
By snickerdoodle12 13 hours ago
By behringer a day ago
By pests 8 hours ago
By 1n4007 12 hours ago
By dotancohen 15 hours ago
By remram a day ago
By Spivak a day ago
By a day ago
By Wowfunhappy a day ago
By wglb 13 hours ago
By zelphirkalt 11 hours ago
By wglb 6 hours ago
By a day ago
By culi a day ago
By jeroenhd 10 hours ago
By redeeman 4 hours ago
By mmsc 15 hours ago
By dylan604 a day ago
By 3036e4 17 hours ago
By aerzen a day ago
By mlinsey a day ago
By simonw a day ago
By JimDabell 20 hours ago
By zelphirkalt 12 hours ago
By bravesoul2 21 hours ago
By captn3m0 21 hours ago
By gnz11 6 hours ago
By a2800276 a day ago
By mrweasel 9 hours ago
By sitharus a day ago
By simonsarris a day ago
By throwaway65449 a day ago
By arcfour a day ago
By bravesoul2 21 hours ago
By abanana 14 hours ago
By reaperducer a day ago
By jppittma 11 hours ago
By ndriscoll 7 hours ago
By JimDabell 20 hours ago
By sandspar a day ago
By fguerraz a day ago
By 9dev a day ago
By snowwrestler a day ago
By slow_typist a day ago
By SquareWheel a day ago
By connicpu a day ago
By bravesoul2 21 hours ago
By a day ago
By xiande04 a day ago
By munchler a day ago
By Finnucane a day ago
By paradox460 a day ago
By jeroenhd 10 hours ago
By gleenn a day ago
By pluc a day ago
By roywiggins a day ago
By 1vuio0pswjnm7 a day ago
By DavideNL a day ago
By 1vuio0pswjnm7 a day ago
By pmontra a day ago
By bornfreddy a day ago
By baobun a day ago
By pluc a day ago
By dylan604 a day ago
By palata a day ago
By culi a day ago
By 1vuio0pswjnm7 a day ago
By zelphirkalt 7 hours ago
By michaelt a day ago
By dylan604 a day ago
By heavyset_go a day ago
By sureglymop a day ago
By qualeed a day ago
By kevin_thibedeau a day ago
By goopypoop a day ago
By anothernewdude a day ago
By Rapzid a day ago
By schiffern a day ago
By adamiscool8 a day ago
By card_zero a day ago
By Timwi 7 hours ago
By goopypoop 2 hours ago
By bredren a day ago
By slow_typist a day ago
By add-sub-mul-div a day ago
By throw123xz a day ago
By tempodox a day ago
By fvgvkujdfbllo a day ago
By Eggs-n-Jakey a day ago
By user070223 18 hours ago
By v5v3 a day ago
By culi a day ago
By sheiyei 21 hours ago
By v5v3 19 hours ago
By padjo 19 hours ago
By Animats a day ago
By alganet a day ago
By Timwi 7 hours ago
By colinprince 11 hours ago
By monista a day ago
By reddalo a day ago
By ozgrakkurt 20 hours ago
By ayaros a day ago
By marsavar a day ago
By sneak a day ago
By ayaros a day ago
By rurban a day ago
By future10se a day ago
By whatevertrevor 21 hours ago
By 1oooqooq a day ago
By iknownothow a day ago
By jpgreens a day ago
By reddalo a day ago
By lazyeye a day ago
By drcongo a day ago
By lerp-io a day ago
By Timwi 7 hours ago
By aleppopepper a day ago
By hinkley a day ago
By unit149 12 hours ago
By A7med a day ago