Bunch of negativity on Apple UI recently, but you gotta give Apple credit for supporting really old phones. Google Pixel, forget about it lol
By alexchantavy 7 hours ago
Pixels 8 and later get 7 years. Not as good as Apple but reasonable.
Pixels 6-7 got 5 years. I'd say that's on the low end of okay.
For "lol" you have to go back to 2021 or earlier. Or look at some of Motorola's offerings.
By Dylan16807 6 hours ago
I left Android at the Nexus 5 after years of buying every Nexus phone. The deal breaker: Despite staying on official ROMs, Google broke audio in video recording such that all my vacation videos with a special friend ended up with garbled audio. My mistake for trusting Google updates right before my trip. You'd think for their reference phone they would test a primary feature like video recording for regressions? Apparently not.
My friend at the time had an iPhone 5, I noticed her phone worked without issue while my Nexus 5 was constantly draining its battery.
I finally bought an Apple device and 11 years later never looked back. Finally said goodbye to Windows & Linux as well. I presume this is how many Apple conversions happen.
Back when Pixel came out I used to argue with a friend because it supposedly had a better camera: I'd always point out that the Pixel phone has its own Wikipedia article describing all its issues: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pixel_(1st_generation)#Issues
Its been like 12 years since the G1? They are still playing games till this day. Give it a rest already.
By nebula8804 6 hours ago
I remember when Google broke 911 calling, and decided it was ok to wait for the next maintenance patch to fix it. People could have died, but Google just couldn't hurry up and release an emergency patch.
911 calling issues have been a persistent problem for Pixel devices.
By simfree 4 hours ago
I went back and forth over years right up until google was caught tracking people even with the feature disabled.
It’s honestly kind of sad. Google could still print money without the endless spying but they just can’t help themselves
By tw04 5 hours ago
> It’s honestly kind of sad. Google could still print money without the endless spying…
They literally couldn’t.
By randmeerkat 5 hours ago
Exactly, that IS Google’s business model.
By danielktdoranie 4 hours ago
> The deal breaker: Despite staying on official ROMs, Google broke audio in video recording such that all my vacation videos with a special friend ended up with garbled audio.
For me it was also the Nexus 5.
It just lost many of my photos, of our firstborn child.
Unrecoverable. Gone. And so was I from the Android-platform.
By josteink 4 hours ago
It’s not unreasonable to blame google for this reliability issue, but this is also a little bit on the user who didn’t appropriately back up their important data to a different device/service/building/account.
By sneak 4 hours ago
They could use Google Photos to store them off the phone, but…
The camera clicked, but they were never saved. Hard to back that up, really.
By josteink 2 hours ago
I used to be on android, but after the Samsung Galaxy S3 started fucking with my settings in updates I went to Apple and have been on iPhones ever since. Specifically what sticks in my memory the most was an update that reset the shortcuts on the bottom menu bar to default and locked it so it was no longer possible to customize it. At the time I used none of those default apps.
Actually, similar reason that I ended up abandoning Windows for Linux on my home desktop (I had been using Linux on work computers for years at that point). Windows 10 kept changing my settings back to default after every major update and it was infuriating. I would have gone for a mac if there were better support for games.
By chillfox 5 hours ago
Yeah everyone seems to have horror stories that pushed them to Apple, and of course there are some more minor horror stories from Apple too but they just don’t reach the same height for most users
By bowsamic 4 hours ago
Remember when the CEO of Google testified before Congress that if they were allowed to purchase DoubleClick and enter the advertising market that they wouldn't link your use of Google services with your advertising profile?
I'll believe Google's promises after they keep them, not before.
By GeekyBear 5 hours ago
We really should be requiring these types of things to be bonded, i.e., if Google says that, they have to bond all company owned stock and all executive stock options and compensations against it.
Same for politicians; they make a claim, they have to sign a bond against all their assets that they’ll do it after the election.
By hopelite 3 hours ago
Like a cease and desist letter, but inverted. Persist and insist, perhaps?
By eproxus 3 hours ago
> Pixels 8 and later get 7 years. Not as good as Apple but reasonable.
I had 3 pixels over the years. all 3 died after 1-2 years tops. And repairability is zero. absolutely would not recommend if you're a digital nomad. meanwhile my iphone 14 is still going strong. Battery life has gone down but still acceptable.
By cultofmetatron 5 hours ago
All of those phones should have been within warranty and swiftly replaced.
By bcraven 4 hours ago
> Pixels 8 and later get 7 years.
looks like Pixel 8 was released October 2023, so not even 2 years ago. not sure I'd put much stock in what Google says about support after <30% of the stated time.
> Pixels 6-7 got 5 years.
looks like Pixel 6 was released October 2021, so not even 4 years ago.
By eigen 6 hours ago
"got" as in announced to be given. Not as in the 5 years of support is already done.
By mkagenius 5 hours ago
It's legally binding.
By Dylan16807 5 hours ago
Yes, and Pixel 6 is still supported for at least another year. I'm not sure what your point is.
By TranquilMarmot 2 hours ago
> Pixels 8 and later get 7 years. Not as good as Apple but reasonable.
Pixel 8 gets 7 years of OS updates, not security updates. That's actually more than the 5-6 years that Apple commits to.
By jeswin 2 hours ago
So, up until 3-4 years ago (around the time of iPhone 13), you couldn't buy a Pixel phone with more than 3 years of security updates? Lol indeed.
By anonymars 5 hours ago
> Pixels 8 and later get 7 years. Not as good as Apple but reasonable
7 to 10 years is a 50% increase. Diminishing marginal returns dents that. But it still represents huge quantities of metal and resources.
By JumpCrisscross 5 hours ago
The phones and the policies haven't been out long enough to see if Google actually releases updates at five years. The Pixel 6 will drop out of support in a year, so we'll see!
By jerlam 6 hours ago
I'm reading this now on a Pixel 2XL. It runs reasonably well, though I've currently got a few too many apps running in the background crapping it up. It's asinine that Google dropped support for this model so quickly, and I really have no faith in them at all anymore. 7 years is what it should have always been.
By zenethian 5 hours ago
Early pixel models comes with unlimited google photos feature etc. I think maintaining is more of a lost revenue to google than patching cost. If customos devs can do it on donation so can google.
Probably a reason for google to obselete them and a reason for us to keep alive and running it as long as possible.
I still see few custom roms spoofing as early pixel models to enable unlimited google photos.
By scbzzzzz 4 hours ago
Pixel 4a… announced Aug 2020… EOL’d Jan 2022… updates stopped Aug / Nov 2023
Android is abandonware IMV
By youngtaff 3 hours ago
My Pixel XL here works great for scrolling at night. I'm skeptical of the "no more system updates" boogeyman; I'd love some case studies or anecdotes about the real-world threats that using an old devices exposes me to.
By edgineer 6 hours ago
> I'd love some case studies or anecdotes about the real-world threats that using an old devices exposes me to.
The Apple patch in the OP is in regards to a zero-interaction exploit that compromised the device to install spyware etc.
> Impact: Processing a malicious image file may result in memory corruption. Apple is aware of a report that this issue may have been exploited in an extremely sophisticated attack against specific targeted individuals.
By judge2020 5 hours ago
> specific targeted individuals.
Isnt this exactly the point? Most people who aren't the target of state intelligence agencies have little to worry about from using an older phone.
By walthamstow 4 hours ago
Those exploits trickle down to less sophisticated actors as they become known.
By jandrewrogers 4 hours ago
It can both be true that it’s good to get security updates for old devices, and that you might have no issues using an old phone personally. It doesn’t make it a boogeyman. Things can be two things.
By jama211 4 hours ago
I have a functional Pixel 3XL that when flashed with one of the few modern Android ROMs available for it feels pretty fine to use for the most part… better than a lot of brand new low end Android devices, if I’m being honest. Too bad it’s not supported any more.
By cosmic_cheese 6 hours ago
It's still supported by lineageos. It's just the installer doesn't do major version bumps, you have to manually reflash to higher versions.
By DistractionRect 4 hours ago
If Graphene can do it, why can't they?
By ThePowerOfFuet 4 hours ago
They can, they just don't want to add more engineering hours to that I imagine
By nar001 36 minutes ago
I just had my iphone 12 mini battery replaced. This thing performs as well as the day I bought it. It will be a sad day when I have to "upgrade".
By bstar77 5 hours ago
Might as well say it since nobody else commented about it, but modem/soc vendors are huge limiting factor on longterm android support. Qualcomm maintains these updates for only a few years, basically nothing earlier than around 2020-2021 gets kernel driver or modem updates.
Of course it's still up to phone manufacturer to integrate these changes, but it puts an effective security support timeline on even 3rd party ROM's like lineageos. They can cherrypick, but it's not as secure once that support ends.
Apple has almost everything in-house (except until recently, modems). So they have a ton of flexibility in continuing to provide updates.
By joecool1029 6 hours ago
My problem with this argument is many of these types of CVEs have nothing to do with baseband firmware or drivers or anything else controlled by Broadcom. Google could still patch security issues in the parts of the system most exposed to attackers, namely the libraries and apps in the OS itself.
I’d be more afraid of a zero day image parsing bug in messages, where I could be exploited with a drive-by spam text or hyperlinked image, than some theoretical baseband attack by someone in a privileged cell network system.
By treesknees 5 hours ago
The problem is that baseband or whatever drivers are made in kernel trees that are essentially forks of the kernel at a certain point in time.
This means that any fix needs to be backported
to that special tree, irrespective of whether the Broadcom code is impacted, which may prove challenging when you end up having not just one but many trees, each at slightly different levels of outdatedness.
The approach clearly does not scale.
The solution would be for Broadcom to be diligent and forward port their tree to current mainline or current LTS at a minimum but they won't do that.
See how the RPi kernel is generally stuck at a special old version (e.g 6.6 for pi4, which is quite reasonably a LTS but then there's 6.12 as LTS already)
By lloeki 43 minutes ago
Sure, but like, this is a fundamental flaw with the Android model. It's valid to criticize Android for this.
By loeg 6 hours ago
The other fundamental flaw in the iphone market is that NOBODY can fix bugs in ios but apple, I have personally fixed bugs in my android builds.
By worthless-trash 4 hours ago
That’s great for you. But it doesn’t make a difference to the other 99.999999% of users who only install whatever is available from automatic system updates.
It’s the equivalent of saying in response to a political issue that affects all of society - doesn’t really affect me because I flew to my private island. We’re happy for you, but how does that advance the conversation?
By testdelacc1 3 hours ago
Just because everyone doesn't do what I do, doesn't make it wrong.
By worthless-trash 2 hours ago
I’m not saying you’re wrong. It’s just irrelevant. So what if you can patch the issue on your phone, how does that affect the rest of society?
It just sounds like you’re bragging about your technical chops, like a person with a private island would be flexing their wealth.
By testdelacc1 2 hours ago
I question your use of the word “fundamental“.
By jb1991 2 hours ago
Same as OP's fundamental.
By worthless-trash 2 hours ago
Which is insane if you think about it. 20 year old NICs are still supported by the kernel. Hardware drivers should be GPLd, no ifs and no buts. As if having closed source drivers gave OEMs a competitive advantage, it's basically all for planned obsolescence
By qalmakka 4 hours ago
Apple depends on Qualcomm just like everyone else (except for the new iPhone Air)... so this really doesn't seem like a valid excuse for Android manufacturers.
By hamandcheese 4 hours ago
They don't though (also the 16e has in-house apple modem, I have no idea what the fate of the intel modems was). The majority of other vendors' designs get full qualcomm soc's with dsp, modem, security processor firmwares.
Apple literally has the scale to go to Qualcomm and buy slightly customized variants (the X71, for instance). And those modems are integrated with their custom Apple designed chips. I don't see any other vendor able to do that.
By joecool1029 4 hours ago
Sounds like something Google could solve with contracts and money if they wanted to.
By chillfox 5 hours ago
I pay a vendor for something in my product and the vendor support period is limited, as a consumer, that should not be your problem.
By hsbauauvhabzb 5 hours ago
Not surprised. I met with Samsung for work purposes to buy hundreds of phone, and the best they could do with their flagship phones was offer 3 years of security updates. This was around 2019. Apple, who didn't meet with us, was around 6 years from our estimate.
From a ROI, for corporate phones, Apple iPhones had a longer lifespan, which is why we bought hundreds of iPhones, and not Androids.
On a personal note, I had the Nexus S, the Nexus 5, and they all died a horrible death either from lack of updates, or just having the physical button break, and the microphone stop working.
And let us not speak of Sony Xperia Z5, which all of sudden removed their fingerprint sensor due to a North American patent problem. They also broke their bluetooth audio so that song names STOPPED being displayed. That was all in a span of less than 3 years.
Never again Sony Android phones.
At that point, I got fed up of custom ROMS and joined the "iPhone, it just works" group and moved on.
By unfocused 5 hours ago
Fwiw Samsung is now 7 years OS/Security on flagships and 6 years OS/Security on the entry/mid-level Galaxy A Series.
By mastercheif 5 hours ago
Yes, but it took them a long time to get there.
By imp0cat 4 hours ago
It's interesting Apple is doing this specifically to protect old devices from seemingly nation state sponsored attacks:
> Apple is aware of a report that this issue may have been exploited in an extremely sophisticated attack against specific targeted individuals.
By varenc 5 hours ago
People who might be targeted by nation state actors should really be running a phone that’s on the latest OS. It wouldn’t cost that much to not use a 9 year old phone. If you’re remotely afraid of your government, you can afford a phone released within the last 5 years. It’s worth it!
By testdelacc1 3 hours ago
> If you’re remotely afraid of your government, you can afford a phone released within the last 5 years.
Why in the world would you think that? Who do you think governments target, Bond villains?
By handsclean 3 hours ago
Journalists mostly. Also prosecutors, judges, opposition party members.
By SSLy 11 minutes ago
I think they are doing this to protect millions of people from mass attacks once the nation-state attack gets RE’d in the next few hours/days and deployed by non-governments, much more likely.
By sneak 4 hours ago
> Apple is aware of a report that this issue may have been exploited in an extremely sophisticated attack against specific targeted individuals.
Even if there was no mention of this or the implication that it’s linked to the notifications Apple sends for targeted attacks, is it fair to say this kind of backdated security patch implies a lot about the severity of the vulnerability? What’s Apple’s default time frame for security support?
By sunrunner 8 hours ago
Yes, this means it was exploited in a spyware campaign in the wild.
The full exploit chain seems to target WhatsApp directly using a second bug in WhatsApp; although this vulnerability is definitely present anywhere this kind of image is processed using Apple’s native image support, it would usually be aggressively sandboxed (in iMessage by BlastDoor and in Safari by the web content sandbox), so you’d need a lot more vulnerabilities than those that are currently disclosed to make it useful in those places. A bug in WhatsApp itself is particularly bad in terms of spyware actors, since it leaves one of their most popular targets, WhatsApp, vulnerable without a significantly more complex kernel escalation and sandbox bypass.
One key thing I noticed is this is before iPadOS was a thing, so this patch targets iPads too... Which makes me wonder... this is speculation no proof, but I wonder if someone is exploiting Point of Sale devices that are powered by old iPads somehow, which is out of the control of a lot of end-users who are at thee mercy of the POS vendors who are probably charging an insane premium on them.
I worked at a restaurant chain and I remember it being a whole thing to even consider reworking the POS tables + software due to rising costs.
By giancarlostoro 7 hours ago
By the phrasing this is almost certainly a patch for targeted vulnerabilities to install Pegasus or similar.
By batiudrami 7 hours ago
I work for a POS company that uses iPads (along other clients) and I’ve not heard of anything like that. I assume it’s people of interest (journalists, or politicians).
Also my company, as well as at least 1 other I know of that uses iPads, don’t sell the iPads to the stores, they replace or buy their iPads directly from Apple. Smaller places handle it all themselves, larger might use MDM but they are buying them at-cost.
I’m not saying everyone does that, just that I’m not aware of it.
By joshstrange 6 hours ago
Only if you think some state intelligence agency is wasting million-dollar vulnerabilities on a bit of credit card skimming.
By rafram 6 hours ago
> What’s Apple’s default time frame for security support?
This isn't thaaaaat far out of support. Their last security update for iOS 15 was just earlier this year, and they only dropped iPhone 6s from new major versions with iOS 16 a few years ago. As someone who has kept my last few iPhones for 5+ years each, I definitely appreciate that they keep a much longer support window than most folks on the Android side of things.
By sfilmeyer 8 hours ago
Before I got my first iPhone five years ago, I always noticed that iPhone owners would drag it along for a long time, but really the phones are tanks. I remember switching Android phones every two years, because they quite literally started to decay. I think my last Android Phone I could have probably made last longer than two years, I still turn it on and play random games on it, and its still very responsive.
I assume they know just how long their customers keep their phones and maintain them accordingly.
By giancarlostoro 7 hours ago
This... is the opposite of my experience. Friends with iPhones seem to upgrade them unreasonably often, but my (Samsung) Android phones last a loooong time. My first Samsung I retired somewhat involuntarily after 3 years so that I could get a model that would also work overseas, but the phone itself was still fine. My second Samsung (the one I got in 2016 for the overseas trip) I just retired last fall, 2024, and even then only because a job required MS Authenticator and it wouldn't let me download it to the phone. Battery life was still fine, everything I used worked fine.
I fully expect to be using my current Android phone into the 2030s.
By blahedo 7 hours ago
Well your experience is maybe more based on your friend behavior than on an absolute rule.
This is the same for absolutely every manufactured goods. The same durable car model will be kept for over a decade by some people while some other opt for a leasing plan that guarantee a new car every two years. But the intrinsic quality of the car remain unaffected.
To ponder this you must consider what become of the phone they replace : did they trash it or did they have a second life with a less edgy owner?
By Twisell 2 hours ago
Maybe you use low end phones or crappy vendors?
I'm migrating from my 5 year old flagship (lol) only because vendor decided to stop supporting it. Battery still good for a day, great screen, good enough camera, fantastic sound, ssd card slot...
My next has at least 7 years of mainline support (with all AOSP releases) plus at least couple of years damage control updates.
It's a matter of the choose I think.
By subscribed 7 hours ago
The second hand resale market for iPhone is huge, especially in Asian 3rd world countries.
It is in Apple’s interest to keep old iPhones updated, as old iPhones being in active usage is better than them rotting in a drawer.
By jnaina 5 hours ago
A relative of mine used their Galaxy Note II until the internal flash died and it stopped booting. It was definitely over 5 years old by that point.
By opan 7 hours ago
> is it fair to say this kind of backdated security patch implies a lot about the severity of the vulnerability?
That is my assumption, that the result is a pretty severe impact and/or the victim has little to no way to prevent it (zero click situation).
Granted I can't speak for Apple, but I was thinking along the same lines you were.
By duxup 8 hours ago
No specific timeframe is defined, but they tend to release things that matter really far back — like, the Apple CA certificate expiration update went out a few years ago to basically the entire deployed Square terminal iPad userbase, etc. I expect it’s driven by telemetry and threat model both. Presumably the cutoff is wherever the telemetry ceases!
By altairprime 8 hours ago
Almost certainly some kind of zero click/zero user action RCE exploit.
Edit: I should've read, "Impact: Processing a malicious image file may result in memory corruption."
So simply receiving an image via SMS or loading it in some other way likely accomplishes the initial exploit, so yeah, zero click exploit. Always bad.
By zomiaen 8 hours ago
I think their minimum standard is 5 years after they stop selling a product. However, it could go longer if things still work.
The 6S was discontinued in 2018, which would give it support until at least 2023, so we aren’t too far beyond that.
By al_borland 7 hours ago
Headline is slightly misleading. It implies that the update is only available on the 6s, when in reality it's available for:
> iPhone 6s (all models), iPhone 7 (all models), iPhone SE (1st generation), iPad Air 2, iPad mini (4th generation), and iPod touch (7th generation)
That's a lot of devices, more so than "10-year old iPhone 6s" implies.
I won't be upgrading my iPhone 7 and 4th gen iPad mini, because I don't want to take the chance that the update needs an update to Dopamine to be jailbroken. Fortunately they're secondary devices for me.
By LocalH 5 hours ago
I think it’s just highlighting the oldest device that got the update, not a huge deal
By jama211 4 hours ago
It was a huge enough deal that the title of this post got changed.
By jb1991 2 hours ago
This reeks in all possible ways of nation state activity.
By bombcar 7 hours ago
One single nation
By hopelite 3 hours ago
It’s great that they made an update.
It’s not clear to me if this can result in a RCE. If it does, then does this mean that enough iPhone 6s are still out in the wild where a bad actor could easily take over a big enough portion to do more nefarious things?
It seems to me that this exploit was used in a chain with a WhatsApp issue that would trigger the malicious DNG data to be loaded as a zero click, presumably just into WhatsApp. It’s unclear to me if there was a sandbox escape or kernel vulnerability used along with this; it might have been used to exfiltrate WhatsApp messages only.
This would explain why there’s only a single patch for a simple memory corruption issue; usually an attacker would need a lot of chained vulnerabilities to bypass mitigations on iOS, but if the vulnerability is in the exact target application to begin with, it sure does make things easier.
By bri3d 7 hours ago
> Apple is aware of a report that this issue may have been exploited in an extremely sophisticated attack against specific targeted individuals.
By scosman 8 hours ago
This specific vulnerability was already known and exploited - and patched by Apple - three weeks ago on devices that Apple deemed "current".
By jerlam 7 hours ago
This doesn't really mean much on account of the iOS ecosystem only supporting the latest two OS versions in their apps as a general rule. Once you are behind 2 versions, your device becomes quite useless at that point
By occz 4 hours ago
Quite useless?! I still use my iPhone SE (1 gen) from 8 years ago. It’s working perfectly fine for my daily business. Sure, some newer apps I cannot install, but so far I’m not missing anything important. Banking apps work, navigations works, obviously the browser still works, etc
By Jaxan 2 hours ago
Apple does support their phones for some time. But note that 10 years is only if you bought the iPhone 6s when it was new and at its most expensive. The iPhone 7 (Plus) wasn't discontinued until 2019 and is on the same iOS version. So it got something like 3 years of OS upgrades (impacting app support) and 6 years of security upgrades in the worst scenario.
By lansol 6 hours ago
Mate if you go by when manufactures stop selling devices, there’ll be android devices with _negative_ support years.
And that’s 6 years _so far_.
By jama211 3 hours ago
Kudos to Apple but are they going to update iPhone 8 firmware too? Think it’s been over a year since the final release. (Surely security vulnerabilities have been discovered since then!!)
iOS 16.7.12 was released on September 15, 2025 (to fix this same bug) and runs on the iPhone 8.
By bri3d 6 hours ago
I wish they would do the same for iOS 17, instead of forcing users to upgrade to iOS 18. A bunch of superfluous works and many of them even erroneous. Alarm clock for example: if you didn't allow it to snooze, pressing on the power button will snooze it, but without the possibility to turn it off easily. Why on earth would somebody rewrite the alarm clock?!
By sinuhe69 5 hours ago
I'm no Apple fanboi--quite the opposite. But I take a note of this act and tip my hat, considering how Android OEMs have been pumping out abandonwares.
By penguin_booze 7 hours ago
honestly this is incredible, though i'm not sure how the android space is catching up? apparently google and samsung have been promising 5/6 years of software updates recently as well
By abhimanyouknow 5 hours ago
7 years of (supposed) support for newer Pixel phones
By TranquilMarmot 2 hours ago
Well, good. The moment they stop, it's declared E-waste and Apple suggests you give it to them for free.
Fucked-up world we live in where a disposable vape can be reused for more purposes than an iPhone with expired software support.
By bigyabai 8 hours ago
I got plenty of old iPhones I can still use.
My pile of old android phones ... they sadly do not live long overall as far as a % of survivors goes. A few have lived long lives for sure, but overall not as many as my old iPhones.
By duxup 8 hours ago
Ever since the Pixel 2, the Android phones put out by Google have been long lasting. I have a Pixel 2 XL that still works just fine and it's now 8 years old. Doesn't get OS updates but it works.
By TranquilMarmot 2 hours ago
Unfortunately I think it'll be much worse in the coming years with Google's ban on ban sideloading apps and other companies following them.
By MrTrvp 8 hours ago
For whatever reason I don't sweat that condition in Apple land, but I do find it very worrisome to see Android land forego side-loading.
By duxup 8 hours ago
it was upfront disclosed in Apple land in that I knowingly know this to be true and do not expect it as a feature but it is a surprise new condition with no notice in Android land that makes it such worrisome action
By galaxy_gas 7 hours ago
Choose phones supported by LineageOS where the bootloader can be unlocked, and you can easily outlast iOS.
By chasil 8 hours ago
I used to do this back when I was on Android and official updates only lasted 1-2 years. Now I’m on an iPhone I get official OS updates for such a long time I don’t need to worry about flashing custom roms.
By Gigachad 8 hours ago
I want root reliably.
Every version of Lineage offers rooted debugging, even without Magisk.
I know that root can be obtained in iOS, but Apple really prefers that users be restrained from this capability.
By chasil 7 hours ago
My experience just with the hardware doesn't match that. My android devices just tend to fail over time more often than iPhones.
Granted, there's PLENTY of other good reasons to make that choice even with that condition. So I don't disagree generally.
By duxup 8 hours ago
Can't say my experience matches yours, either. I too have a box of unsupported mobile devices; the stuff I can do on an Android device clears every iOS one. I can't install apps on iOS without a desktop and a specific unsupported iTunes client. I can only use a subset of iOS functions.
My Android phones still do everything they say on the tin. Regardless, you've worded your entire argument to be orthogonal to my original point so it's clear you're not arguing in good faith. Nothing you ever said was related to the principles I mentioned, just what you consider to be personally valuable. Which is fine, but akin to responding to a health food nut by saying how great burgers taste.
By bigyabai 7 hours ago
I am out of date on the latest from the jailbreak scene, but checkra1n supports the device up to iOS 14. If you updated to iOS 15, there may not be a full jailbreak, but not all is lost.
The latest release of Xcode, Xcode 26, still allows you to build apps for iOS 15. At some point you will have the secondary problem of needing an older Xcode which only runs on an older macOS, though Apple has been doing the minimum to make it possible to acquire both of these.
With a free Apple Developer account, you can sign and side load your apps, but they expire every 7 days, and you wouldn't be able to add any restricted entitlements. But the TrollStore exploit (https://github.com/opa334/TrollStore), which I cannot vouch for, seems to work around these limits.
So: It seems like if you are the kind of person who keeps disposable vapes to reprogram the microcontrollers, the iPhone 6S should actually be an attractive device worth keeping:
- Runs an operating system released in September 2021 and received regular bug fixes and security updates through July 2024. Still receives occasional security updates as of September 2025. Not completely end-of-life.
- Supported by the latest developer tools, probably through June 2026, with older downloads available (https://xcodereleases.com/).
- Known jailbreaks and exploits to maximize utility.
It's not surprising that the trade-in value for a 10-year-old device is nil, but on the secondary market they fetch about $60 (https://swappa.com/prices/apple-iphone-6s) which is not bad if you consider the device capabilities compared to most hobbyist devkits.
By rgovostes 6 hours ago
I think if we're comparing the easiness of repurposing an EOL phone, it is much better to just check the postmarketOS wiki for supported devices and pick one of those instead. They got great instructions for reflashing/jailbreaking the bootloaders etc.
And yes, you get a full blown Linux with it. So you can, like me, repurpose your smartphones into pretty much everything. I have removed their batteries and have them solar powered as Freifunk routers and even offline-ready kiwix media servers among other things.
If old iPhone can be easily hacked like a disposable vape, of course you can repurpose it. But you can’t.
By uni_baconcat 3 hours ago
Well you need to protect the store. This sounds like something useful to root a device.
By oaiey 5 hours ago
If Apple followed Security Development Lifecycle (SDL) well, the update should not be here.
By iqandjoke 4 hours ago
And if drivers followed the Safe Driving Protocol (SDP), we wouldn't need airbags. Real life happens regardless of the imaginary frameworks infosec people dream up.
By alexchantavy 7 hours ago
By Dylan16807 6 hours ago
By nebula8804 6 hours ago
By awill 6 hours ago
By krackers 5 hours ago
By simfree 4 hours ago
By tw04 5 hours ago
By randmeerkat 5 hours ago
By danielktdoranie 4 hours ago
By josteink 4 hours ago
By sneak 4 hours ago
By simonh 3 hours ago
By josteink 2 hours ago
By chillfox 5 hours ago
By bowsamic 4 hours ago
By GeekyBear 5 hours ago
By hopelite 3 hours ago
By eproxus 3 hours ago
By cultofmetatron 5 hours ago
By bcraven 4 hours ago
By eigen 6 hours ago
By mkagenius 5 hours ago
By Dylan16807 5 hours ago
By TranquilMarmot 2 hours ago
By jeswin 2 hours ago
By anonymars 5 hours ago
By JumpCrisscross 5 hours ago
By jerlam 6 hours ago
By zenethian 5 hours ago
By scbzzzzz 4 hours ago
By youngtaff 3 hours ago
By edgineer 6 hours ago
By judge2020 5 hours ago
By walthamstow 4 hours ago
By jandrewrogers 4 hours ago
By jama211 4 hours ago
By cosmic_cheese 6 hours ago
By DistractionRect 4 hours ago
By ThePowerOfFuet 4 hours ago
By nar001 36 minutes ago
By bstar77 5 hours ago
By joecool1029 6 hours ago
By treesknees 5 hours ago
By lloeki 43 minutes ago
By loeg 6 hours ago
By worthless-trash 4 hours ago
By testdelacc1 3 hours ago
By worthless-trash 2 hours ago
By testdelacc1 2 hours ago
By jb1991 2 hours ago
By worthless-trash 2 hours ago
By qalmakka 4 hours ago
By hamandcheese 4 hours ago
By joecool1029 4 hours ago
By chillfox 5 hours ago
By hsbauauvhabzb 5 hours ago
By unfocused 5 hours ago
By mastercheif 5 hours ago
By imp0cat 4 hours ago
By varenc 5 hours ago
By testdelacc1 3 hours ago
By handsclean 3 hours ago
By SSLy 11 minutes ago
By sneak 4 hours ago
By sunrunner 8 hours ago
By bri3d 6 hours ago
By giancarlostoro 7 hours ago
By batiudrami 7 hours ago
By joshstrange 6 hours ago
By rafram 6 hours ago
By sfilmeyer 8 hours ago
By giancarlostoro 7 hours ago
By blahedo 7 hours ago
By Twisell 2 hours ago
By subscribed 7 hours ago
By jnaina 5 hours ago
By opan 7 hours ago
By duxup 8 hours ago
By altairprime 8 hours ago
By zomiaen 8 hours ago
By al_borland 7 hours ago
By LocalH 5 hours ago
By jama211 4 hours ago
By jb1991 2 hours ago
By bombcar 7 hours ago
By hopelite 3 hours ago
By logankeenan 5 hours ago
By transpute 7 hours ago
By bri3d 7 hours ago
By scosman 8 hours ago
By jerlam 7 hours ago
By occz 4 hours ago
By Jaxan 2 hours ago
By lansol 6 hours ago
By jama211 3 hours ago
By BobbyTables2 6 hours ago
By jonchang 6 hours ago
By bri3d 6 hours ago
By sinuhe69 5 hours ago
By penguin_booze 7 hours ago
By abhimanyouknow 5 hours ago
By TranquilMarmot 2 hours ago
By bigyabai 8 hours ago
By duxup 8 hours ago
By TranquilMarmot 2 hours ago
By MrTrvp 8 hours ago
By duxup 8 hours ago
By galaxy_gas 7 hours ago
By chasil 8 hours ago
By Gigachad 8 hours ago
By chasil 7 hours ago
By duxup 8 hours ago
By bigyabai 7 hours ago
By rgovostes 6 hours ago
By cookiengineer 4 hours ago
By uni_baconcat 3 hours ago
By oaiey 5 hours ago
By iqandjoke 4 hours ago
By feisty0630 3 hours ago