According to saltwater fish...
What about all of the freshwater fish?
Cool map though!
By ggerules 11 hours ago
Freshwater fish have multiple, much smaller maps which have no connection to each other.
By normie3000 10 hours ago
Are rivers 2d or 1d?
By dvh 10 hours ago
3d
By edoceo 10 hours ago
4d when they flow
By stronglikedan 4 hours ago
Not to mention that no fish would have any insight into at least whatever is within visible distance from the shore surface. An accurate version of such a map would highlight an interesting perspective of how humans also lack the ability to perceive, comprehend, or even accept things they either physically or psychologically cannot perceive or do not wish to perceive and accept it.
By hopelite 10 hours ago
More importantly, I imagine a 2D map would not be useful for fish: there is much more space to represent when you can also swim up and down.
I may be very easy to amuse but but Spilhaus projection for compact Hausdorff space (the surface of the Earth) tickled my drying bones.
Seems the landmasses are indeed housing off all that spilled water.
Humor aside, the first thing it reminded me of is the Quincunx projection. There all the landmass is at the centre and is housed off by the oceans. And you can tile Euclidean space with it.
Is there or could there be an equivalent centered on the north geographic pole?
I'm aware of Polar Stereographic Projections and similar but they don't unify the oceans the way the Spilhaus does.
By dang 10 hours ago
By mmooss 3 hours ago
By ggerules 11 hours ago
By normie3000 10 hours ago
By dvh 10 hours ago
By edoceo 10 hours ago
By stronglikedan 4 hours ago
By hopelite 10 hours ago
By fph 9 hours ago
By croisillon 9 hours ago
By cratermoon 3 hours ago
By srean 10 hours ago
By worik 11 hours ago
By cratermoon 3 hours ago