What surprised me is that when I went to look at the Wikipedia page for CF, apparently its latest release was this year! I haven’t heard anybody mention it in a very long time.
By JimDabell 3 hours ago
I was active in the ColdFusion/CFML community for a long time, and still run some production code in it. It certainly isn't popular, but just carries on quietly, powering a lot of internal applications you'll never hear about. Many run the open source version of it (Lucee).
By bdcravens 2 hours ago
Indeed it does. I maintain one such application while an in-progress rewrite develops. Gotta say, it's not been that bad and the Lucee docs have served me well, but for whatever reason I tend to be pleased/impressed by all kinds of tech, even when popular opinion is negative about it.
By tootubular 2 hours ago
With how deeply embedded cold fusion was in many gigantic corporations I've worked with, I would not be surprised if it stays alive for decades to come because nobody ever can port off of it.
By freedomben 2 hours ago
Don't remember the full context, but I heard a few years ago from Adobe that they could never sell another license to the private sector and government licenses would be self-sustaining.
By bdcravens 2 hours ago
Lucee took over and is still active (ish).
By conception 2 hours ago
I worked at a major university that used ColdFusion. They had one guy furiously writing all these websites that were total one-offs. They didn't use source control. Every project was a copy of his original. If there was a bug, he had to update dozens of projects instead of maintaining common source across those dozens of sites. He was totally insane and making bank.
Also longtime internet celebrity and occasional HN poster Pud built the wildly successful Distrokid service with it.
By CPLX 3 hours ago
It's superficially tailwind-y, but in fact a sort of stenographic subset of SQL:
db-{table}-{column}-where-{field}-{value}-limit-{n}-orderby-{field}-{asc|desc}
db-users →
SELECT * FROM users
db-users-name →
SELECT name FROM users
db-users-where-id-1 →
SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = 1
db-posts-title-limit-10 →
SELECT title FROM posts LIMIT 10
db-products-orderby-price-desc →
SELECT * FROM products ORDER BY price DESC
Certainly can result in some terribly inefficient access patterns, as there's no obvious syntax for joins. But enough for a toy project, and enough to hit the HN front page %)
By nine_k 2 hours ago
It's not really very fun when these joke projects are built by AI.
By Starlevel004 2 hours ago
This hilarious. Some people wouldn't know a good joke if it mugged them in an alley.
By ricardonunez 2 hours ago
It's hard to tell these days. Anyone can now say "what if..." And have an agent build something that either looks a lot like (or is) that thing.
By jasonjmcghee 2 hours ago
That's because most devs are so overwhelmed with having to keep up with XYZ that the joke isn't even funny.
By lisbbb 2 hours ago
everyday there is a new `insert something related to react` framework.
Everyday we stray further from the simplicity god.
By olcarl75 3 hours ago
Having clicked on the link, it's one commit with the commit message "wtf"
The README also says "License: MIT - Do whatever you want with it (except deploy to production )"
It's that perfect level of absurdity that captures so much of the terrible complexity that often happens.
By mdasen 3 hours ago
There's a guy complaining that the creator is poisoning the collective code used to train LLMs. If that's all it takes we have a moral responsibility to flood GitHub with garbage.
By valiant55 3 hours ago
Surely a simple filter by number of stars on a project would improve the quality of code LLMs ingest.
By pennomi 2 hours ago
You just convinced me to star it.
”I’m doing my part!”
By stefanfisk 2 hours ago
Complexity demon everywhere.
By valiant55 3 hours ago
hopefully I never have to review someone unironically using something similar in production code since I don't think I'll be able to stop myself from dropping a slur or two.
By kachapopopow 3 hours ago
The author is on point: "Making AI and blockchain accessible for founders who want to ship fast."
By esafak 2 hours ago
Luckily this entire thing is a joke.
By kachapopopow an hour ago
The actual disturbing thing is that given Next‘s track record of questionable security architecture, the author felt compelled to make the joke explicit.
By nehalem 2 hours ago
From the site: "For fun only - don't use in production"
By sixtyj 3 hours ago
Wow holy abstraction!
Weird stuff, seems to be vibe-coded using cursor and also the github issues are full of spam.
I didn't look to see if this is a joke, but seriously, is SQL still a big thing in web dev these days? Feels like it isn't. GraphQL is a thing.
By lisbbb 2 hours ago
GraphQL and SQL are not comparable or competing technologies. GraphQL is more analogous to a REST API. GraphQL can use SQL under the hood, or you can even hand serve the bytes (tongue in cheek here). It's just an over-the-network protocol to serve data.
a Node.JS server might use SQL directly or call out to a GraphQL API, but I literally don't think it's possible to let client-side JavaScript (safely) call a SQL database server directly.
By wmichelin an hour ago
"Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn't stop to think if they should"
By JimDabell 3 hours ago
By bdcravens 2 hours ago
By tootubular 2 hours ago
By freedomben 2 hours ago
By bdcravens 2 hours ago
By conception 2 hours ago
By lisbbb 2 hours ago
By CPLX 3 hours ago
By nine_k 2 hours ago
By Starlevel004 2 hours ago
By ricardonunez 2 hours ago
By jasonjmcghee 2 hours ago
By lisbbb 2 hours ago
By olcarl75 3 hours ago
By mdasen 3 hours ago
By valiant55 3 hours ago
By pennomi 2 hours ago
By stefanfisk 2 hours ago
By valiant55 3 hours ago
By kachapopopow 3 hours ago
By esafak 2 hours ago
By kachapopopow an hour ago
By nehalem 2 hours ago
By sixtyj 3 hours ago
By tacker2000 3 hours ago
By 2 hours ago
By johnhamlin 3 hours ago
By yousif_123123 3 hours ago
By crazygringo 3 hours ago
By kykeonaut 2 hours ago
By postepowanieadm 3 hours ago
By linhns 2 hours ago
By divan 2 hours ago
By ranza 2 hours ago
By rglover 3 hours ago
By gedy 3 hours ago
By geekjeremy 2 hours ago
By moron4hire 2 hours ago
By 3 hours ago
By bakugo 3 hours ago
By crazygringo 2 hours ago
By Yokohiii 3 hours ago
By lisbbb 2 hours ago
By wmichelin an hour ago
By usernamed7 3 hours ago