Kind of a useless analysis if it doesn't compare the risk after stopping GLP-1s to the risk of NEVER taking GLP-1s in the first place.
We probably don't know the numbers yet, but one can easily envision a scenario like: risk of CE without GLP-1 weight loss: 20%. Risk after taking GLP-1s for 2 years: 10%. Risk after stopping GLP-1s: 12%. "Your heart attack chance goes up 20% after stopping GLP-1s!!!"
By TaupeRanger 3 hours ago
Especially since every GLP-1 study shows almost complete regain to original weight after stopping.
It’s like stopping a blood pressure medicine and then being surprised that people have more heart attacks afterwards.
By gpt5 2 hours ago
The discontinued and paused groups in the actual study had lower BMI than the continuing groups - so it seems like this is at least partially independent of any weight regain.
Which makes sense since we have strong evidence for the GLP-1s providing significant protective benefit even without weight loss.
By cthalupa an hour ago
It's not useless. It might be expected, but now it's more certain. This allows planning with it.
By smallnix an hour ago
This is a very odd phrasing that makes it seem like heart attack and stroke risk are higher for those who stop taking the drug than those who never took the drug. Moreover, the effect of restarting taking the drug seems attributable to the study design. Those who took a break had higher risk at the end of the study than those who don’t. But those who took a break took the drug for less total time than those who took it for the entire study.
You could characterize these same facts in the opposite way. GLP-1s don’t permanently change your body. They provide benefits while taking them but quickly clear out of your system when you stop taking them. Arguably, that’s a good thing in a drug.
By rayiner 3 hours ago
>This is a very odd phrasing that makes it seem like heart attack and stroke risk are higher for those who stop taking the drug than those who never took the drug.
That does appear to be the case, according to the study.
By IAmGraydon 3 hours ago
It certainly does not. To make that claim, the study would need a control group of people who had never taken the drug. They didn't have that:
> Participants Veterans Affairs users with type 2 diabetes who started treatment with GLP-1RAs (n=132 551) or sulfonylureas (n=201 136), followed up for three years. Veterans Affairs users were defined as having at least two visits to Veterans Affairs and having used the Veterans Affairs outpatient pharmacy within a year before receiving treatment with GLP-1RAs or sulfonylureas.
By post-it 3 hours ago
> They didn't have that
So, why not? Seems very obvious to everyone here on HN that it's "kind of useless" unless they did have that, yet they didn't. What reason would there be for ignoring that?
By embedding-shape an hour ago
The conclusion of the study says:
> This study showed that discontinuing and interrupting GLP-1RA treatment could erode and might reverse the cardiovascular benefits of the drug in a duration dependent manner, increasing the risk of cardiovascular events.
emphasis mine
By kube-system 3 hours ago
Could.
By conception an hour ago
Isn't GLP-1 creating a "feel-good" starvation? Patching the receptors telling the brain one is not hungry and then just letting the body starve happily, leading to significant muscle loss and aged face? Contrary to e.g. water fast where the body switches to 100% ketosis that can run as long as there is any fat in the body and one supplements electrolytes (Mg/K/P/HCO3) and vitamins (predominantly B1/B2/B3), leading to a much more healthy appearance?
By storus 13 minutes ago
GLP1s do not themselves cause any worse muscle loss than you would experience if you lost the weight by watching calories the old fashioned way.
"Ozempic face" is almost certainly an artifact of people who spent their life significantly overweight having somewhat looser skin than they would if they had maintained a low weight throughout their life.
Also, not everyone gets the face effect, not by a long shot.
By rootusrootus 6 minutes ago
There is nothing inherent in your description that would support your implied claim about facial aging.
By mrtesthah 9 minutes ago
I’m always kind of envious of the people who were able to lose weight on GLP-1 drugs. I lost a bunch of weight a few years ago, and still need to lose a lot more (430 lb -> 330, goal 240), but I fell out of the good habits for, well, no good reasons…
Decided to try Ozempic and was on it for about 6 months. Didn’t do a single thing for my appetite unfortunately, even on the max dose.
Sample size of one here, but if you’ve got mental health struggles that feed into your eating patterns, GLP-1s might not help with your weight problems.
By Teknoman117 2 hours ago
Wegovy/Ozempic didn’t do anything for me for months. Then my doc put me on Tirzepatide+Phentermine combo and I forgot what being hungry even feels like.
By brap 2 hours ago
Do you have to remind yourself to consume things like proteins, etc to prevent muscle loss?
By vladgur an hour ago
I couldn't hit my macros on tirzepatide - couldn't get enough protein without feeling sick to my stomach. One of the reasons I swapped to reta.
(though as a general note for anyone reading, just getting enough protein isn't enough - you need muscle stimulus too. Getting enough protein will help reduce the amount lost but if you really want to stop it, you gotta do resistance training)
By cthalupa 42 minutes ago
How long have you been on Phentermine? For me it stopped working after only a couple weeks.
By bobsmooth an hour ago
It lets me more or less skip a meal but holy hell I am craving sugar more than ever. On the whole I'm cutting calories and have lost a lot of weight, I just wish I didn't want sugar this much.
By 01100011 2 hours ago
I’ve always been more of a savory kind of person myself. I’d take biscuits and gravy or a steak over sweets any day!
But I feel you on sugar. Took me a long time to cut sugar cravings. A decade ago I cut regular soda out of my diet, which a few years later led to me cutting out pretty much anything sweetened. Realistically it wasn’t the sweetness for me, it was the “mouthfeel” or doing something with your mouth. Just straight sparkling water satisfied the entire craving for me.
The hardest thing for me to give up / heavily cut back on was fried things. Maybe that’s the result of my parents using french fries as the reward food when I was a kid…
By Teknoman117 2 hours ago
Try allulose-sweetened stuff. Allulose is a sugar your body doesn't metabolize like sucrose. It has zero calories and does not increase your blood sugar. It's a component of maple syrup and so does taste a bit maple-y, but better than most artificial sweeteners and even stevia leaf extract (stevia and aspartame have a "tang" to them I dislike).
By bitwize an hour ago
That's unfortunate! It might be worth checking out Tirzepatide or Retatrutide once it is released. The GIP and Glucagon receptors might be better targets for you, even if the GLP-1 receptor seems to not help.
By cthalupa 2 hours ago
Hey, I can identify. Sending good thoughts your way.
By bradleyy 2 hours ago
I really had thought (with no research) the correlation between mental health and glp1 effectiveness went the other way around. Thank you for this check-your-biases moment, you probably just saved me a ton of embarrassment down the line, if these drugs ever enter my life.
By pitched 2 hours ago
Did you try those zero-sugar candy bars (often labeled as protein bars)? They work quite well for me, no messing with GLP-1 necessary.
By amelius 2 hours ago
Which do you like? Barebells salty peanut and chocolate dough over here. Though the sugar alcohols certainly aren’t great for you either, I think they were recently linked to stroke risk
By j-conn 2 hours ago
Munk Pack is a good brand. They're like Kind bars but sweetened with allulose.
By bitwize an hour ago
You missed out on both of the weight suppression tricks, which really does suck. Appetite suppression (or reduction of food noise) is pretty useful, but GLP1s also tend to punish you mightily if you overeat. For me, even if I were hungry, overeating will make me hurt for hours. I could not gain weight on this even if I wanted to.
There are some difference, too, between the various drugs. I never tried ozempic, I went directly to tirzepatide (zepbound). And then to retatrutide. I will say that reta is in some ways the most interesting, because it has less appetite suppressing activity than tirzepatide (this is common, not just me), but it still cuts my stomach capacity quite a lot, and ramps up my metabolism. I had stalled at about 90 pounds down with tirzepatide, and reta immediately knocked off another 15. I track calories, and I had changed nothing. Felt more hungry, still lost more weight. Wild.
From one rando to another, I recommend trying tirzepatide. Or try semaglutide again but stacked with cagrilintide -- some people get pretty great results with that, similar to tirz.
By rootusrootus an hour ago
Similar experience here with Tirzepatide. Overeating is punished swiftly and painfully.
If it works for you, look into getting one of the 15mg pens and counting clicks in order to get more doses per vial. I've been on the one pen for 3 months now and it's still got plenty of juice left.
By AussieWog93 35 minutes ago
One of the quirks of buying brand name GLP1s in the US is that we don't get the dial-a-dose pens, every autopen is one-shot. Some people disassemble them to get multiple doses, but at that point you might as well get the cheaper brand name vials or go with compound or gray.
By rootusrootus 22 minutes ago
When I was on Ozempic in the US (Bay Area), it was a dial-a-dose Ozempic branded pen. Came with 4-6 single use needles you’d screw onto the end before use, and discard into a sharps bin after.
By Teknoman117 10 minutes ago
Yeah I might just have to go get it out of plan. Kaiser covers Ozempic, but none of the Tirzepatide based medications. (Edit: looks like that might have changed)
I am a big guy (6’4, 330 lbs), but I was amazed that Ozempic just seemed to do nothing. I was having the gastric side effects, but I could still eat 3000 calories a day if I cheated without feeling anything.
By Teknoman117 an hour ago
I went down from 390lbs to 240lbs gradually over 5 years. I have maintained a weight of 240lbs since then (6'1" tall).
The first year was the most dramatic loss of 100lbs. I was miserable and didn't know what I was doing other than counting calories. The rest of it was more considerate of total nutrition, and that's what made my good eating habits stick.
I say this because while I'm not a doctor I think GLP-1 is probably unnecessary for the vast majority of patients. Better food and information is more available than ever before.
I would strongly advise to watch your A1C and get out of the diabetes danger zone if you are. Most people can drop a few percent in as little as 6 months and it makes a massive difference in mental health. Blood glucose has a direct impact on the brain and overall cardiovascular health. If you drink alcohol, you might want to take a break also to let your liver/kidneys/pancreas do their jobs properly and restore insulin sensitivity and other hormones. Look into the "fruit paradox", and more generally get a good salad in for lunch to address nutrient deficiencies. Not crappy salads either. You're not a rabbit. Treat them like the amazing sandwiches without bread that they are.
Sounds like old advice, because it is, but I find people aren't listening because they want to more deeply understand why to do it and what the effects are. Convenience and unintuitive pricing are false bargains that get in the way of healthier habits. Focus on nutrition and not quantity. Change your groceries, change your life.
By sublinear 24 minutes ago
> I say this because while I'm not a doctor I think GLP-1 is probably unnecessary for the vast majority of patients.
We have mountains of evidence that willpower fails for something like 99% of everyone, which is far from a vast majority. I applaud anyone's efforts to become healthier, however (though 240 at 6'1" is still obese, I would still explore medicine if I could not get any lower "naturally").
By rootusrootus 16 minutes ago
Thanks for the reply. Your perspective framing this as "willpower" is precisely what I'm concerned about.
I didn't need any willpower to do this and I'm not even humblebragging or think of myself as a tough guy. I'm saying that healthy habits are simply a matter of understanding.
I did not change my diet. If anything I just added more variety with a specific intent and it worked. Even just changing the order in which you eat things (fiber before sugary foods) can make a big difference. Once I got the blood glucose under control, all the strong cravings and eating mistakes basically went away on their own without my conscious effort. Your body is all connected and driven by hormones.
By sublinear 2 minutes ago
The actual study states in the summary that it's the cardiac protective improvement that reverses, not that you're worse off for having taken a GLP-1.
So yeah, when you stop taking something that protects your heart and kidneys, it stops protecting... your heart and kidneys.
There's an increasing body of work that indicates that long-term GLP use (initially higher doses for weight loss, then tapering down) retains the cardiac and kidney benefits and can actually lead to additional weight loss.
By bradleyy 2 hours ago
Kind of makes sense that stopping taking a drug that reduces heart attack and stroke risk leads to a return to the higher risk of before.
By Robotbeat 3 hours ago
It doesn't reduce heart attack and stroke. It reduces appetite, kind of, and gives you a sore stomach while making you shit yourself inside out. All this can, with care, help contribute to weight loss.
Weight loss can reduce heart attack and stroke, but GLP-1 does not.
You could also reduce heart attack and stroke risks by not eating crap and going for a walk every so often.
By ErroneousBosh 2 hours ago
We see risk reduction for heart attack and stroke for people on GLP-1s even without weight loss, which belies the idea that the protection only comes from losing weight.
Edit:
In fact, from the study -
BMI went from 35.86 (Continued) to 34.57 (Discontinued) to 35.48 (Interrupted),
Heart failure percentage was 11.57% for continued use, 12.73% for discontinued, 11.92% for interrupted
NICM went 3.10% for continued, 3.36% for discontinued, 3.31% for interrupted
BMI was higher for the continuing users and they still had lower heart failure and NICM rates than the discontinued and interrupted groups. (Also a bunch of other things including stroke and heart attack but I didn't want to write all of these out)
By cthalupa 2 hours ago
What is it about GLP1s that bring out the kooks who suddenly think diet and exercise are the only valid medical treatment? Is it a moral issue?
By rootusrootus an hour ago
As best as I can tell, people are very attached to having achieved their body weight through whatever means they have determined are valid and derive self value from it, and believe that GLP-1s are cheating to achieve a result they worked harder for.
By cthalupa an hour ago
Your comment is all kinds of wrong.
A) it does have cardio protective effects.
It does reduce your appetite, and for most people have very few side effects. If you get nausea you're titrating up too fast. Most people, because it slows gastric emptying, it doesn't make them shit themselves "inside and out". GLP1s are a decent option for treating ibs-d or bile acid issues and is better tolerated than your bile acid sequesterants.
> You could also reduce heart attack and stroke risks by not eating crap and going for a walk every so often.
This victim blaming advice has been given for decades and obesity rates have been climbing for decades. Only glp-1s have reduced that.
By malfist 2 hours ago
How much of this could attributed to simply having less artificial hormonal support for not overeating after discontinuing treatment, and falling back into old habits? I’d love to see more research focused on these mechanisms.
By ldayley 3 hours ago
In veterans with T2 diabetes:
> To find out what happens when people stop taking GLP-1s, Al-Aly’s team of researchers tracked the health of more than 333,000 United States veterans with type 2 diabetes for three years.
By 46493168 3 hours ago
Also News I guess - People who pick up smoking again after a period of cessation, regain all negative effects of smoking that they previously experienced during that past smoking periods, eliminating the positive effects of the smoking cessation.
By Aboutplants 2 hours ago
Others have addressed the clickbait nature of the title
I'm just surprised the food industry or whoever is willing to fund FUD content that ostensibly has such an indirect effect on their bottom line.
Although I guess they spend a ton on ads which are also of dubious value, so maybe it's to be expected.
By 0x3f 2 hours ago
I mostly feel bad for job losses due to AI, but I won't shed a tear for journalists who make a living spreading misinformation about the results of research.
> They found that the risk of heart attack and stroke jumped in those that paused GLP-1 treatments for as little as six months, compared to those who continued taking the medication.
(Emphasis mine) The 'jumped' would more correctly say 'tended to revert to baseline' if you just had a basic LLM summarize this study for you...but then that wouldn't drive clicks and shares on your article.
By mullingitover 2 hours ago
Honestly don’t understand it. Feels like a lack of discipline. I was 250. Plugged in a bunch of numbers into an app and it gave me a calorie count per day. I brought a scale with me everywhere, used ChatGPT to guesstimate calories, I added 50% for good measure. A year later I’m 175. You can’t do this even with drugs you’re gonna get fat anyway.
I’m most curious about someone like me vs someone who lost the same amount on glp1 with respect to these stats
By amazingamazing 2 hours ago
I'll bite!
A decade or so ago, when I was still in uni, I managed to get similar results naturally too - ~100kg down to ~65kg in around 18-24 months just by eating healthy and exercising more.
I put back all of that weight and then some during the COVID pandemic (I'm in Melbourne, Australia - we had the worst lockdowns on planet Earth) and this time struggled for years to lose it until trying GLP-1 drugs a few months back.
For me, what made it harder the second time around wasn't so much of a difference in discipline skills (if anything, they've improved) but the fact that there was so much more going on in my life - young family constantly getting sick, small business that started struggling, relationship/social issues, health issues (sleep apnoea) etc. etc.
I'd get on the weight loss train, lose a couple of kilos, then the whole family would get sick with the flu and I'd put it all back on again while recovering. Or maybe I'd be forced to shift my focus to the business so that we could keep the lights on. Or any number of things.
I guess my point is that it's not difficult to lose weight naturally (or any self-improvement, really) in and on itself, but it's completely different ballgame when you're fighting a war on 6 different fronts. Having one of those problems simply just disappear through GLP-1 drugs genuinely feels like a miracle.
By AussieWog93 41 minutes ago
We know that GLP1s have benefits that are disproportionate with just weight loss, so someone who is otherwise like you in terms of weight loss would probably have better cardiovascular markers.
Probably the biggest difference, though, is that an average "you" will be back at original weight, plus a little, in about a year, while the average GLP1 user will (assuming they keep taking it) be the same weight, or even a bit lighter.
By rootusrootus an hour ago
Everything is discipline. If you just always do the thing you’re supposed to you will win at life. People can’t always do the thing they’re supposed to so they supplement with drugs that help them do it: caffeine, amphetamine, SSRIs, GLP-1RAs and related drugs.
In fact, everything is discipline. If you were disciplined enough to always put the basketball in the net from anywhere on the court you’d be Steph Curry. The thing is most people don’t have that kind of discipline. Someone runs up to them and puts their hand up in the air? They shoot wide or balk. Curry shoots true. Discipline.
Just always do the right thing and never do the wrong thing and you’ll be fine at literally everything.
By renewiltord an hour ago
Some things require talent like your examples, weight loss does not imho. The disparities in obesity and culture within country says it all.
By amazingamazing an hour ago
The ability to be disciplined about eating is also a talent.
Or do you think that somehow genetics don't play one of the largest roles in your ability to be disciplined when it comes to food?
By cthalupa an hour ago
If you can be disciplined about taking a drug you can about food. How do you explain correlations in obesity across cultures? Genetic superiority? Again, imho just making excuses for laziness. The same logic you’re applying here also applies to even taking the drug and picking up refills from the mail…
Also look at obesity rates across time within the same country. It’s clearly not an issue of discipline, it’s an issue of what’s being eaten.
By amazingamazing an hour ago
Why in the world do you think that taking a once a week injection requires even remotely similar levels of discipline to dealing with daily hunger and food noise? There's like, a dozen orders of magnitude in between. This is a silly argument.
> How do you explain correlations in obesity across cultures? Genetic superiority?
Every developed nation in the world except Japan has been seeing obesity and overweight rates rising at significant rates, including countries that have fairly similar cultures, such as Korea. You also see people move to America and stay in relatively isolated pockets of their culture and still gain weight.
So no. It's a matter of access to hyper palatable calorie dense food. The more of it around, the more likely people are to get fat. The fatter you get, the more of a feedback loop you end up in for a wide variety of known and relatively well understood mechanisms. GLP-1s help short circuit that feedback loop.
By cthalupa 44 minutes ago
You just have to be disciplined to always shoot accurately at the basket. Most people send it one way or the other but if you are disciplined enough in your aim at the basket no matter the constraints you will be the best basketballer of all time.
By renewiltord 31 minutes ago
This makes it even more fantastic that the supply of GLP1s from my country's only legal importer is spotty and I've been suddenly cut off twice already
By nisegami 2 hours ago
One benefit of going gray is that you can stock up. If I could not get any more, it would be a number of years before I ran out.
By rootusrootus an hour ago
Studies get worse every year.
By bethekidyouwant 3 hours ago
Or articles that try to convey the content of studies have always been poor and continue to be poor.
By jimbokun 2 hours ago
The most capitalistic drug ever! Take the drug forever and lose weight but stop taking it and you’ll die.
By Aboutplants 2 hours ago
That isn’t what this says at all.
By devin 2 hours ago
(off-topic, but since the thread already is..)
HN felt like one of the last places on the internet I could have good-faith conversations with intelligent people who would form thoughtful, on-topic replies.
And now it feels like the user base here has shifted enough that the voting system no longer consistently elevates the interesting comments, but the comments that reinforce people's worldviews.
By mh- 2 hours ago
Everyone feels this way about HN at some point, it is normal. It is probably true that the user base has grown and so you see more low-value comments in absolute numbers as time goes on, but I still think the overall quality is decent and the community moderation solid.
It is also a Friday afternoon, and HN's weekend (and to some extent overnight) 'personality' is noticeably different than during typical business hours. I enjoy coming here on weekends but it gets a bit more wacky.
By rootusrootus 13 minutes ago
Everyone feels Eternal September sooner or later. I recommend blocking users on this site. Having hit about 800 or so blocks I find that the conversation quality has skyrocketed. You still get one or two low quality users on a thread like this (I hadn’t blocked this guy) but the truth is that it’s usually a few people.
Any time a user gives me a flash of annoyance with a nonsensical comment that’s the last time I see them. This isn’t a native feature but Claude will implement it for you in a really short amount of time. If you want a feature set to copy or a list of users to seed, you can just copy mine (in profile).
By arjie an hour ago
Yeah, unfortunate that it's come to that, but I think you're right.
I started to write a comment about having some (additional) ideas for a Chrome extension, clicked your profile, watched the YouTube video. Fantastic. I think it already does everything I wanted.
Thank you for making and open sourcing this!
By mh- an hour ago
What do you mean? All of the comments that misunderstand the study are downvoted from what I see.
By TaupeRanger 2 hours ago
We finally found the first morbidity signal of GLP-1s (or lack thereof).
These are life changing drugs, but like plastic we'll see their effects in force within this generation:
> The longer time spent off GLP-1s, the greater the risk of major cardiovascular events—up to 22 percent for those who abstained for two years.
By jryio 3 hours ago
Doesn't it make sense that, if you were taking a drug that reduces morbidity, you'll get increased morbidity if you stop it?
By stavros 3 hours ago
Not if having a heart attack within 1 year at a higher rate is an co-morbidity factor when the primary treatment was for obesity or diabetes (not stating that obesity and heart disease are not positively correlated).
To use a dense analogy: if I stopped brushing my teeth I would not expect to die of gum disease.
By jryio 2 hours ago
I don't think you read the study. The people returned to their pre treatment risk profile after ceasing treatment
By malfist 2 hours ago
You are misunderstanding the study (largely because the article heavily misrepresents it, would be my guess)
They do not see an increase against their pre-GLP1 baseline risk - they see a reversal of the cardioprotective benefits the drug provided while they were on it.
By cthalupa 2 hours ago
You failed to understand the results of the study and quoted a passage that does not in any way support your assertion.
By TaupeRanger 3 hours ago
By gpt5 2 hours ago
By cthalupa an hour ago
By smallnix an hour ago
By rayiner 3 hours ago
By IAmGraydon 3 hours ago
By post-it 3 hours ago
By embedding-shape an hour ago
By kube-system 3 hours ago
By conception an hour ago
By storus 13 minutes ago
By rootusrootus 6 minutes ago
By mrtesthah 9 minutes ago
By Teknoman117 2 hours ago
By brap 2 hours ago
By vladgur an hour ago
By cthalupa 42 minutes ago
By bobsmooth an hour ago
By 01100011 2 hours ago
By Teknoman117 2 hours ago
By bitwize an hour ago
By cthalupa 2 hours ago
By bradleyy 2 hours ago
By pitched 2 hours ago
By amelius 2 hours ago
By j-conn 2 hours ago
By bitwize an hour ago
By rootusrootus an hour ago
By AussieWog93 35 minutes ago
By rootusrootus 22 minutes ago
By Teknoman117 10 minutes ago
By Teknoman117 an hour ago
By sublinear 24 minutes ago
By rootusrootus 16 minutes ago
By sublinear 2 minutes ago
By bradleyy 2 hours ago
By Robotbeat 3 hours ago
By ErroneousBosh 2 hours ago
By cthalupa 2 hours ago
By rootusrootus an hour ago
By cthalupa an hour ago
By malfist 2 hours ago
By ldayley 3 hours ago
By 46493168 3 hours ago
By Aboutplants 2 hours ago
By 0x3f 2 hours ago
By mullingitover 2 hours ago
By amazingamazing 2 hours ago
By AussieWog93 41 minutes ago
By rootusrootus an hour ago
By renewiltord an hour ago
By amazingamazing an hour ago
By cthalupa an hour ago
By amazingamazing an hour ago
By cthalupa 44 minutes ago
By renewiltord 31 minutes ago
By nisegami 2 hours ago
By rootusrootus an hour ago
By bethekidyouwant 3 hours ago
By jimbokun 2 hours ago
By Aboutplants 2 hours ago
By devin 2 hours ago
By mh- 2 hours ago
By rootusrootus 13 minutes ago
By arjie an hour ago
By mh- an hour ago
By TaupeRanger 2 hours ago
By jryio 3 hours ago
By stavros 3 hours ago
By jryio 2 hours ago
By malfist 2 hours ago
By cthalupa 2 hours ago
By TaupeRanger 2 hours ago